San Marcos Mercury | Local News from San Marcos and Hays County, Texas

February 3rd, 2017
San Antonio congressman Lamar Smith sets ‘Make EPA Great Again’ hearing


WASHINGTON — Invigorated by the new climate change-doubting presidential administration, a Texas congressman known for his ardent skepticism of manmade global warming — and early support for President Donald Trump — has scheduled a committee hearing next week “to examine the Environmental Protection Agency’s process for evaluating and using science during its regulatory decision making activities.”

Invited witnesses, including the head of an industry group, “will discuss how EPA can pursue environmental protection and protect public health by relying on sound science,” according to a charter for Tuesday’s hearing of the House Committee on Science, Space and Technology.

The hearing, titled “Make EPA Great Again,” will be the first time the committee has met since Trump took office and the 115th Congress convened.

The committee’s chairman, San Antonio Republican Lamar Smith, has been an especially vocal skeptic about widely accepted science on climate change. In a 2015 op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, he described global temperature increases over the past 15 years as “negligible” and said links between climate change and worsening weather events had been debunked.

During the latter half of that year, he sparred with the head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration over the methodology of a study that agency scientists published in the journal “Science.” (The study found that a widely publicized “lull” in the rate of global warming, a cornerstone of conservative arguments against climate change-related policies, resulted from faulty statistical methods.)

The 16-term congressman also has actively intervened on behalf of ExxonMobil amid high-profile investigations into what the oil giant knew about climate change and when. He convened a congressional hearing on the matter and demanded documents from the state attorneys general that would reveal the inner workings of their investigations.

Smith’s office did not make him available for an interview.

In 2015, a group of Austin environmental activists presented Smith an award, in absentia, from “Flat Earth Foundation of Texas” to protest his efforts. Those efforts certainly weren’t aided under the Obama administration, which made fighting climate change one of its top priorities.

Trump, on the other hand, has repeatedly called climate change a “hoax” and nominated climate skeptics to head several major federal agencies, including the EPA (Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt, whom the Senate confirmed Thursday) and the Department of Energy (Former Texas Gov. Rick Perry).

Various reports also indicate the administration is considering drastic cuts to the EPA budget.

Smith was the first member of Congress to donate to Trump in last year’s presidential campaign and has made it clear he views the new administration as an ally in his efforts.

“With this new administration, the Science Committee has an enhanced opportunity to create and implement policies that inspire innovation, generate jobs, and keep America competitive,” Smith said in a statement announcing committee appointments for the 115th session of Congress.

“Emphasizing sound science at EPA” is Smith’s No. 1 priority for the committee, according to a news release.

As part of that, he plans to “revisit” bills he filed during the previous congressional session, which ended in early January, that “further highlight the (EPA’s) need to use sound science and transparent data to justify its rules and regulations.” That legislation includes the Science Advisory Board Reform Act and the Secret Science Reform Act, which passed the U.S. House but not the Senate.

“EPA has long been on a path of regulatory overreach, and the committee will use the tools necessary to put EPA back on track,” the release said, noting the panel also will examine the “Social Cost of Carbon,” a measure EPA has used to calculate the climate impacts of various environmental regulations.

It “has been previously used by the federal government to push a costly climate agenda with little transparency or accessibility by the American public,” the release said.

KIAH COLLIER reports for the Texas Tribune where this story was originally published. It is reprinted here through a news partnership between the Texas Tribune and the San Marcos Mercury.

Email Email | Print Print


3 thoughts on “San Antonio congressman Lamar Smith sets ‘Make EPA Great Again’ hearing

  1. As Smith has received over $697,000 from the Oil & Gas industry since 1998, it’s not much of a surprise he’s going to view anything that negatively impacts that industry as being against HIS interests as well. Smith is “in the pockets” of Oil & Gas … he doesn’t appropriately represent the interest of his individual (non-corporate) constituents.

  2. When it comes to environmental safety, unleashing industry to do what it wants will lead us a very bad place indeed. I understand the need to revisit some EPA regs, but do we really want to revert back to the days when rivers caught fire? (It happened, folks. A lot.)

    The town where I grew up in Wisconsin was down river from paper plants that, lacking all those “bad for business” environmental controls, polluted the river at will. You couldn’t swim in that water, and if you caught any fish, you’d release them because you sure as hell didn’t want to eat them.

    EPA regs were instrumental in turning all that around. Unfortunately in recent years, the EPA had become a convenient target for the right. Any woe that industry suffers is placed at the EPA’s doorstep. Layoffs? Blame the EPA!! Why not? It’s easy, and people are apt to accept it.

    It’s fairly well recognized that when people don’t like the conclusions of scientists, they simply attack the science. That’s what Smith is doing, very likely at the behest of his energy industry benefactors.

    But without reasonable controls on polluters, we are leading ourselves into very dangerous territory indeed. I’ve seen it, folks, and it ain’t pretty.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.