San Marcos Mercury | Local News from San Marcos and Hays County, Texas
CTMC 092016 728x90 ad

COVER: Travis County Republican Party chair Rob Morrow, wearing his signature jester’s cap, speaks in support of removing Lone Star Rail from the Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization’s long-range regional plan as Hays County Pct. 3 Commissioner Will Conley (shown left of Morrow) and San Marcos Mayor Daniel Guerrero (right) listen. PHOTO by AUSTIN MONITOR

by CALEB PRITCHARD

AUSTIN — The Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization gave the Lone Star Rail District an all but fatal kick in the caboose on Monday night.

Members of the CAMPO Transportation Policy Board overwhelmingly voted to begin the process that will remove Lone Star Rail from CAMPO’s long-range plan. The resolution also includes a request to the Texas Department of Transportation to pull funding for Lone Star Rail’s ongoing environmental impact study. Only San Marcos Mayor Daniel Guerrero voted against the measure; Travis County Commissioner Brigid Shea and TxDOT District Engineer Terry McCoy abstained.

The vote was the climax of Lone Star Rail’s slow-motion derailment, which began in February, when Union Pacific informed the district that the company was removing its coveted rail line from consideration in the long-gestating passenger rail service between Georgetown and San Antonio.

It also capped off an extended wrangling session over the precise wording of the CAMPO board’s intent at what was an unusually crowded meeting on Monday night.

Prominent stars of the local transportation and civic constellation showed up in order to voice their opinions during a brief public hearing. Former Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority board member Jim John Langmore and transit activist Roger Baker both spoke in favor of continuing to search for multimodal options along the Interstate 35 corridor, while anti-transit activist Jim Skaggs and Travis County Republican Party chair Rob Morrow – wearing his signature jester’s cap – urged the board to kill Lone Star Rail.

Austin City Council member Don Zimmerman underscored the anti-LSTAR sentiments. “I think of Lone Star Rail as a vampire,” Zimmerman told the board. “Please drive a stake through its heart and make it go away.”

After the public comments, CAMPO executive director Ashby Johnson laid out the resolution that was included in the meeting’s agenda. He explained that Union Pacific’s refusal to participate with Lone Star Rail raised terminal questions about the district’s proposed financial model. He said the staff recommendation was to pull the $2.05 billion project from CAMPO’s 2040 planning document.

Johnson went on to explain that the procedure for executing that recommendation would involve a 30-day public comment period, 10 open house meetings across CAMPO’s six member counties and another public hearing at the board’s scheduled meeting in September. A final vote to formally pull the plug on Lone Star Rail would then be set for the board’s Oct. 10 meeting.

While several representatives of the suburban jurisdictions voiced their support for the resolution at hand, Austin Mayor Steve Adler proposed an alternative resolution that would set the final decision for December. He also requested that CAMPO board members arrange a meeting with Union Pacific officials for one last round of discussions.

Adler was quickly talked down from the December date back to the October deadline. After a lengthy discussion, Cedar Park Mayor Matt Powell questioned why Adler hadn’t spearheaded a meeting with Union Pacific in the six months since the company originally pulled out of the Lone Star Rail planning process.

Adler explained that his attention had been consumed with the federal Smart City Challenge that Austin lost to Columbus, Ohio, in June. After that, Adler said, he was busy with his economic development trip to Asia.

Ultimately, the tortuous discussion – fraught with a failing PA system – over whether to organize a last-ditch sit-down with Union Pacific rankled Travis County Commissioner Gerald Daugherty.

“This is almost ridiculous,” Daugherty began before correcting himself. “No, no. This is ridiculous. What part of ‘no’ don’t we understand?”

Daugherty said that Union Pacific had consistently sent signals since 2002 that it had little interest in participating in the Lone Star Rail scheme, which would run passenger service through cities on existing rail lines while relocating freight traffic to an as-yet-unbuilt corridor to the east of the current alignment.

Finally, chairman Will Conley opted to include Adler’s language about a new meeting with Union Pacific. After the meeting, Lone Star Rail deputy executive director Joe Black surmised that the meeting could bear some fruit.

“If Mayor Adler, with more of a political approach, is able to entice Union Pacific back to the table, the (environmental impact study) may be able to continue,” Black said. “It may not be under Lone Star Rail, but it could continue.”

In any contingency, there still existed apparent support among the board members, including Conley, for a renewed search for passenger rail service between the Austin and San Antonio metros. CAMPO’s San Antonio counterpart, the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (known as AAMPO), seems to be in a similar situation.

On Monday afternoon, the San Antonio group’s executive committee voted to pass on the opportunity to provide funding for Lone Star’s environmental impact study. However, spokeswoman Linda Vela told the Austin Monitor that the committee members expressed a desire to continue exploring multimodal options with CAMPO along the Interstate 35 corridor.

CALEB PRITCHARD reports for the Austin Monitor where this story was originally published. It is made available here through a news partnership between the Austin Monitor and the San Marcos Mercury.

Email Email | Print Print

--

4 thoughts on “CAMPO vote signals the end for Lone Star Rail

  1. Thank you CAMPO. Lone Star Rail has been a joke. The proposed route from south San Antonio to Cedar Park with 15 stops would mean that trip would take at least 3 hours.

  2. Winchester, driving from South San Antonio to Cedar Park via I-35 would take over 2 hours with no traffic, and at rush hour more than 3 hours — and that’s without accidents stopping traffic. Check the drive times on Google Maps.

    I get it. There’s nothing like the convenience of climbing into your car and arriving right at your destination. I realize there is almost always a time sacrifice when using mass transportation in urban settings. The bus doesn’t come to your house, and the train doesn’t stop at your office.

    But in some cases, I’d argue this is a false convenience.

    As someone who used to commute to work on a train, I can tell you that you get those hours back. You can work, read the paper, make calls, take a nap, play Madden NFL, and safely text like crazy if you want. Those are not lost hours. In areas where mass transit is anemic (and that would be Central Texas), people have a hard time envisioning what it would be like to travel by train. Assuming the transportation networks serving rail stations are in place, it’s actually pretty easy. And you don’t arrive at your destination feeling like hell because you’ve just spent 3 hours in bumper-to-bumper traffic.

    This is one of the fastest-growing corridors in the nation. Without sound alternatives like commuter rail, Austin’s horrible traffic gridlock will eventually reach us here in Hays County. Pushing for commuter rail is thinking ahead. It’s planning for the inevitable day when highway traffic is so bad that people who work in South Austin will conclude that San Marcos is just too many traffic jams away to call home.

    We can’t pave our way out of this problem. Extra lanes won’t solve it, and toll roads aren’t being used. (Just ask the operators of the SH 130 toll road. They filed for bankruptcy a couple days ago.)

    I’m sorry to see CAMPO give up on this. It had potentail. But as with so many crises in the making, we’ll only get serious about addressing it when we have no choice, and when it’s a much more difficult and expensive problem to solve.

  3. South SA to Cedar Park is what 100 miles? Max speed for the train with 15 stops is roughly 30 mph, add in the stop times, you are looking at 4 hours, at least. Now consider that San Marcos, Buda and Kyle don’t really have mass transit. The current Lone Star Rail plan is a joke. And of course Union Pacific has said no thanks.
    .
    As an ex Austin dweller I can tell you that Cap Metro is a poorly functioning organization, and they would be a major player in this system.It needs to be rethought and actually planned. And the cost estimates need to be accurate.

    And in 10 years what has Lone Star Rail done? Appears to be, have meetings, nothing else.

    There are so many issues that the current rail planners (using that term loosely) either don’t or can’t address. Quality of road bed, single or dual track, express trains, etc.

    Please note that I never said a rail system was not a good idea, just that the current plan won’t work.

  4. I lived in the NYC area for a few years and near Dallas for many years and I can tell you that allowing more growth and development without providing mass transit will lead eventually to a transportation crisis. I35 will cease to be a reasonable way to travel. I’m now retired and no longer have a daily commute, but I see no alternative to raising whatever money (yes – taxes) is required to get going very soon on rail. Buses and additional highway lanes will not do the job. Our electeds need to get going on this right away.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

:)