by JIM MALEWITZ
The “polar vortex” that swept across much of the nation early this month knocked two North Texas power plants offline just as residents began turning up the heat and revving up power use. Grid operators fixed the problem, but not before warning consumers that they were a step away from issuing rolling blackouts.
With that, the weather added fuel to a high-stakes debate about the state’s electricity market and the demands of its soaring population.
“With low temperatures earlier this week, we narrowly escaped rolling blackouts,” a group of electric generators warned in a full-page advertisement in the Austin American-Statesman just days afterward. “We won’t be so lucky in the years ahead if we don’t take action now.”
As the generators and big energy users like manufacturers spar in Austin over how best to encourage the building of new power plants, another important question is getting less public attention: How can Texas curb its energy use?
Generators are pressing regulators to shift the state’s “energy only” market to a “capacity” model, which would pay power plants to maintain reserves and be ready to meet demand peaks — a multibillion-dollar proposition. They say that low natural gas prices have eroded the economic incentive to build plants.
Critics of the idea — which include consumer advocates and big energy users — say the costs of maintaining those reserves would fall to consumers, and some argue generators are exaggerating the grid’s troubles.
But balancing the grid involves more than just increasing capacity. Perhaps the state’s most promising conservation tool is “demand response,” which relies on high-tech thermostats and meters that allow utilities to power down air-conditioners, heaters or pool pumps when demand peaks. The programs, which are voluntary in Texas, can take many forms. One offered by CPS Energy of San Antonio lets the company control its customers’ energy use when the grid is stressed — usually for a few minutes at a time, and at times specified by customers.
Demand response “probably deserves more focus and attention,” said Doyle Beneby, the president of CPS Energy, a municipally owned utility that has not taken a position in the capacity market debate. “In Texas, it could be a big part of the solution.”
When the polar vortex hit, CPS Energy saved about 77 megawatts of power use through its two demand response programs. That is enough to power 32,725 homes under normal conditions and 13,680 homes at peak times.
“You don’t really notice,” said Adam Leija, who said he has seen his energy bills shrink since he became one of nearly 100,000 enrollees in the utility’s programs. “It helps us become more energy conscious.”
Demand response is gaining momentum, particularly with industrial power users. But the programs have yet to reach their potential amid struggles to break into the large residential market.
A 2012 report by the Brattle Group, a consulting firm, calculated that demand response shaved about 4 percent of energy use during peak demand times in Texas. But if the state took steps to erode barriers to expansion, the report said, that number could reach as high as 15 percent. Little has changed since the report was issued.
The biggest obstacle to widespread growth of demand response, experts say, is that the Electric Reliability Council of Texas, the state’s grid operator, does not allow demand response companies to participate in the wholesale energy market.
“We need to find a way to bid it into the market,” said Colin Meehan, the director of regulatory and market strategy at Comverge, an energy management firm that has clients in Texas and nationwide. Until then, he said, Texas is essentially functioning with “half a market.”
Editor’s note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly referred to electric generators who are pushing regulators to overhaul the wholesale energy market as “electric utilities.” Utilities are a separate and distinct type of company.
JIM MALEWITZ reports for The Texas Tribune where this story was originally published. It is made available here through a news partnership between the Texas Tribune and the San Marcos Mercury.Email | Print