San Marcos Mercury | Local News from San Marcos and Hays County, Texas
Email Email | Print Print --

December 13th, 2011
Freethought San Marcos: The Gospel according to Tebow

Freethought San Marcos: A column
by LAMAR W. HANKINS

I don’t normally write about an individual’s religious beliefs unless that person is a politician using religion to further his or her political career. But the religion of Tim Tebow, the current quarterback for the Denver Broncos, fits into that genre, although Tebow uses his religion to boost the performance and popularity of a pro football team and his ambition to be a winner, rather than to boost political ambitions.

For those who don’t know, whenever Tebow scores a touchdown, he drops to one knee and assumes a prayerful stance, presumably thanking his God for making his success possible. Tebow is not alone in such public demonstrations of piety. Many football players who score for their teams engage in similar acts of religious fealty. Some touch an area near their heart and point upward to the sky, the usually accepted location for God’s residence, as though giving God credit for their athletic accomplishment. Others kneel and make the sign of the cross, or some combination of religious demonstrations. Often, field goal kickers, just before the ball is snapped, cross their chests in the manner of priests invoking the blessing of the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost.

I’ve never understood why linemen don’t do the same for an excellent block they have made which allowed a half-back to break through the line and score, or gave time for the quarterback to throw a touchdown pass. Maybe players think God deserves credit only for the points on the scoreboard, not the grunt work it takes to make those scores. When Tebow gets around to writing his gospel for all to read, perhaps he will explain this aspect of the game.

There are other things I don’t understand about Tebow’s Gospel. Why doesn’t God help him throw better passes? He is a weak passer, with a lousy passing percentage. One would think that making Tebow a better passer would take some of the work out of making the Broncos a winning team. But maybe God likes to keep Broncos fans on edge. It makes the games more exciting than would a five touchdown lead.

But Tebow doesn’t stop with such public displays of righteousness. He talks up his religion constantly to fans, reporters, and teammates. Apparently, the entire Bronco team has embraced Tebow’s religion; maybe they figure it wins games for them.

I always thought that Jimmy Johnson, the former winning coach at the University of Miami and the Dallas cowboys, was smart to study psychology as an undergraduate, even if he never intended to use that knowledge to produce winning football teams. He parlayed what he learned about motivation and human nature into a exceptional career in football that any coach would be pleased with. Tebow may not have knowledge of psychology to help him, but he has learned the basics about group solidarity, optimism, and Norman Vincent Peale’s “Power of Positive Thinking.” He uses his religion to motivate, inspire, and achieve cohesiveness among his teammates. As long as he continues to give them confidence and help them win, few people in Denver are likely to object to his public displays of religious fervor. But if the winning stops, belief in Tebow’s leadership may wane, as may the Broncos’ reliance on religion to augment a mediocre team.

What Tebow has learned, whether intentionally or as a by-product of his piety, is nothing new to those who have played team sports, especially football. My high school football coaches encouraged (though, as a practical matter, we had no choice) the team to gather on bended knee before games (and sometimes afterwards) to recite The Lord’s Prayer in unison. The coaches knew that this praying together created group cohesion, especially in a demographically select group of Christians. I don’t know what might have happened if one of the few Jewish boys in our high school had been a football player. The practice also resulted in an aura of supernatural power hovering over the team. If the players thought that God was on their side, it might give them more confidence to stomp the hell out of the other team. This was not a time to think about the Beatitudes.

In trying to understand the Gospel of Tebow, I have wondered why he doesn’t thank God for his mistakes as well as his accomplishments. After all, if God is helping him score touchdowns, the opposite must be true as well. When the team runs three lackluster plays and has to punt, why doesn’t Tebow thank God for helping him be more humble? The huddle is a perfect place for all the players to take a knee for three seconds, praise Jesus, and call the next play, which might just be a doozy after paying homage to a God so awesome that he takes sides in a football game.

But such God-directed football inevitably leads to the problem of what God might do if two opposing football teams had a similar, if not equal, adherence to the Gospel of Tebow. How would God split the football baby? We know that Solomon was wise enough when confronted with claims by two women that they were both the mother of a baby to offer a solution that demonstrated the superior compassion of one of the women, who was then awarded the baby. But how does this story relate to who wins a football game? After all, in pro football we have “sudden death” to decide the winner in games that are tied after four quarters of regulation play. Of course, God could just not allow a score for fifteen minutes of sudden death overtime play and the game would end a tie. Somehow, this doesn’t seem particularly Solomonic, however.

Lest someone think I am begrudging Tebow his heart-felt religion, be assured that I believe Tebow is entitled to practice his religion in any stadium anywhere. His practice does me no harm. What it does do is cause me to question the depth and wisdom of his belief in a God that cares about the score of a football game. What sort of God is so trivial that he/she/it would be concerned with football while there is so much suffering of innocents in this world?

Biblical scholar and historian Bart Ehrman wrote recently, “I simply couldn’t understand how there could be a good and powerful God who’s in control of this world given all the pain and misery in it. We live in a world in which a child starves to death every five seconds, a world where almost 300 people die every hour of malaria. We live in a world ravaged by earthquakes and tsunamis and hurricanes and drought and famine and epidemics . . .”

And I wonder why Tebow’s “good and powerful God” gives a damn about the Denver Broncos or any other football team, but not about the millions who suffer through no fault of their own. When Tebow can explain that to me, his public piety may make some sense. Until then, it appears to be nothing more than the same crass use of religion for private gain practiced by so many of our politicians. “Go Broncos! Amen.”

© Lamar W. Hankins, Freethought San Marcos

Email Email | Print Print

--

14 thoughts on “Freethought San Marcos: The Gospel according to Tebow

  1. Wow.

    You really are a tool.

    I find it refreshing to see anyone in the NFL (or professional sports) who is genuinely thankful for the opportunities they have been given. I’d take Tebow over Vick, or Jamarcus Russell, any day.

    You don’t have to dig too deep to find countless stories of Tebow’s missionary work in Thailand, the Philippines, and Croatia, his work with charities, etc.

    He spent his spring break volunteering at an orphanage in the Philippines. How did you spend yours? I know how I spent mine, and I’d be ashamed to throw a single stone in his direction.

    In 2008, he said “I believe God gave me this athletic ability for a reason. A lot of pastors and ministers can’t go to the places I’ve been to share my faith because they don’t have the same platform. I see playing football at Florida as a ministry and opportunity to share my faith even more. It’s a chance to be a missionary without the title.”

    He’s not thanking God for a touchdown. He’s thanking God for the opportunity to do something bigger with his life (bigger than football), whether you agree with what he wants to do, or not.

    If all Christians were more like him, we’d all be much better off. You need to find someone else to beat up on. It’s not like there is a shortage of pedophiles and crooks in the church. You’re way off base with this one.

  2. Tebow is a leader and a winner. I’d take hm as my quarterback and as a team leader. He has high character and brings out the best in his teammates. He also does not turn the ball over. He is progressing and let’s not forget how bad his receiving core is. They traded away their best receiver the week they named him the starter and he’s still winning. The defense is playing well and they are playing as a TEAM. It was a better team on paper with Orton but they could not win with him. Tebow helps make the difference and his humility goes a long way. The Broncos are playing cohesive football.

    http://www.whatthehellbook.com/the-book/

  3. Mr. Hankins,
    You have written one of the best examples I have seen
    that highlights the most eloquent descriptions of undestanding
    Nothing of the Biblical God.

  4. Lamar, if the intent of your constant carping about Christianity is to discourage folks from practicing it I would have to ask you why. Even as an athiest you would have to agree that religion makes a pretty good opiate. You don’t have to accept religion to see that it serves well as a good influence in many people’s lives. When you talk about the separation of church and state I’m right there with you but why would you care if football player wants to thump?

  5. I enjoyed the article. Public display of an intimate relationship w/God makes me leery of the human’s motive.

    SM95- You argue: “it makes a pretty good opiate” and “it serves well as a good influence.” Opiate? As in ‘comfortably numb? Dulls the senses? Induces sleep? So that’s why religion serves people well.

    Yes- you’ve nailed why I’m an atheist.

  6. There are (in my estimation) a lot of people who have no other moral compass than what they get from the church. I consider myself an atheist but I’m very fine with a healthy percent being Christian. People on the left side of the bell curve need all the do-good messages we can provide to overcome the self-serving nature of humanity. So Morris, if you’re an atheist do you wish everyone was or do you think it would be better if they were Christian or do you not care? I defended my disbelief for years before it finally dawned on me that the people I was arguing with were probably better off with some church in their lives. I think Lamar is fueling doubt and that’s ultimately a bad thing.

  7. Ah, the faux intellectualism of the non-believer rears its ugly head once again. Unfortunately, all you have truly shown with this article is that you have absolutely no clue what it means to be a man of faith.

    Perhaps instead of wasting time guessing at (and badly misinterpreting) the motivations of men who have chosen to do good with their lives, you should stick to your usual politically-motivated hack jobs. They’re marginally less offensive.

  8. Jesus, what about Jesus? Maybe he learned something from Jesus? And, maybe winning games is not the only game in town. Maybe Jesus and maybe even Tebow are not so 1 dimensional.

  9. Sm95- Do I wish everyone was atheist, Christian, or don’t care… What, no non-Christian religions? But I guess ‘don’t care’. Since man have been worshiping stranger things than a white bearded man in the sky for many of years, I think there will always be a market for that type of activity. Especially if someone can turn it into a business.
    So, “don’t care” since I have no desire (or right) to persuade anyone to leave their faith. (And vice versa- which is why I had to cringe at Ted Marchut’s comment about how great of a missionary Tebow is…How well received would a conservative Islamic missionary be in your neighborhood under the guise of helping you plant your garden?)

    Not sure about “fueling doubt… is ultimately bad”. Any worse than fueling faith? I got out of the article that Hankins was pointing out the Tebow’s PDA with God was getting people talking and thinking about: What is God? and How does He choose His favorites? and Would I still approve Tebow’s PDA to his God if he screamed out “All praise belongs to Allah alone!” after a kick a$$ play?

  10. How well received would an Islamic missionary be received? One like Tebow? S/he’d be very well received at our house. I hope you aren’t trying to imply otherwise. I hope what you are saying, is that *you* cringe at the thought of a non-Christian missionary. I sure don’t. I am tolerant of all faiths, and Tebow gives every indication that he is, as well.

  11. Ted- You win. You’re a better Christian than I am!

    (I don’t discriminate between the missionaries. I cringed at all of them equally.)

  12. I don’t recall saying anything about my beliefs.

    Santa says to be good for goodness’ sake. So, I am.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

:)