by SEAN KIMMONS
City of Kyle council members unanimously approved setting a cap of $3.2 million in constructing a new library amid slight contention regarding whether or not the proposed 20,000-square-foot project would meet Kyle’s future needs.
A few council members stressed concern that Kyle’s growing population could overwhelm the proposed library’s size.
“I’d like to know what would be appropriate for this city,” Council member Lucy Johnson said at the city council meeting Tuesday night.
In 2008, Kyle had a population of about 26,000 people. That number looks to almost double to more than 50,700 by 2013, according to the city’s Web site.
In comparison, San Marcos in 2008 had a population of about 52,900 and a library size of about 27,000 square feet. In the same year, Georgetown had almost 49,600 people and about 49,500 square feet in library space. To the south, New Braunfels had almost 53,500 people with about 26,700 square feet in library space.
So, is a 20,000-square-foot library adequate for Kyle’s future growth? Well, most city officials think so.
“I’m confident that we’ll build the right project,” said Kyle City Manager Tom Mattis.
Former Kyle library director Bill Mears came up with the 20,000 square foot figure as a placeholder for the new library, Mattis said.
“We’ve been using that as our mark,” he said.
Council member Michelle Lopez then defended the figure: “It wasn’t just a number that was created out of the air. I firmly believe that we’re on the right track.”
Mattis added that he could make the library as large as the council wanted it to be.
“We can build it as big as you want to pay for it,” he said.
The library project was originally funded for $3.5 million, leaving some to assume that funding had been cut. However, the city agreed in July to pay about $312,000 for a 2.2-acre lot owned by the Sledge family for the library’s future site in the old town district.
The original $3.5 million included the cost of land acquisition, Mattis said.
Mayor Mike Gonzalez advised that there wouldn’t be space for a larger library on the Sledge site.
“If we make it bigger we won’t have enough parking,” he said.
Council member David Salazar reasoned that the new project would quadruple the space of the current library that sits at 4,900 square feet.
“We’re looking at a significant increase from what we have now,” he said.
Then, Council member David Wilson attempted to squash the contention by adding his two cents: “My concern is that we’re not going to have a library if we keep fiddling with this.”
Sean Kimmons is senior reporter at the Hays Free Press where this story was originally published.
People read in Kyle? Who knew? Next thing you know, the Mercury will trying to convience us that people in Buda go to school.
Yea, yea, I know. Lighten up and smile. Now go ahead and flame me if it will make you feel better.
I think you just flamed yourself Charles.
But I would like to point out that the original 20,000 square foot proposal was from when the library was to be built on “donated” land from a developer in a shopping center behind our Dairy Queen. The current site is 2.2 acres, which equates to 95,832 square feet.
Some Council members are pushing hard on a Recreation Center at an estimated cost of $20 million. Yet the 2006 Parks and Recreation Master Plan proposed a 60,000 square foot facility that would cost somewhere in the range of $10 to $16 million. Can’t understand how this one got out of control, yet the same Council is so intent on not spending a penny more on a library.
Maybe Charles is right after all?
Somewhere I read that the library (as planned) could not be expanded in the future without reducing parking availability. In other words, the library could not be expanded in the future. So I’m back to my original argument – that the chosen site is possibly the worst choice of the available site choices. The free land offered by Plum Creek might have been a good choice. Downtown already has a growing problem with 2-lane traffic and the trains, and bringing yet more traffic to the main downtown street is a bad idea.
Lousy traffic conditions will deter people from going to their library. Just a bad idea all around.
The Plum Creek site was less than half an acre (one half an acre equals 21,780 square feet). The selected site in downtown is 2.2 acres. ANd the site was not “free.” But I’m not going down that road again…
Geez. Now Charles S. is going to say that not only can people in Kyle not read – they can’t add either. Stop making us look stupid Charlie.